Sunday, November 16, 2025

Azerbaijan Seeks Five Life Sentences & 16-20 Year Prison Terms for Former Artsakh Leaders as Sham...

Azerbaijan’s illegitimate, retaliatory, politically driven trial of former Artsakh political and military leaders has...

Armenia to Ban All Polyethylene Plastic Bags & Single-Use Plastic Containers Starting in 2027

Armenia is moving to eliminate single-use plastics nationwide, approving a sweeping ban on the...

ON THIS DAY in 1913 (November 13), Mélinée Manouchian, French-Armenian resistance fighter, survivor of the Armenian...

Born Mélinée Soukémian, her life began in tragedy. As a child, she survived the...

Blogger Lapshin Opens Bank Account In Artsakh To Get €30,000 Compensation From Azerbaijan Per European Court Ruling.

DiasporaBlogger Lapshin Opens Bank Account In Artsakh To Get €30,000 Compensation From Azerbaijan Per European Court Ruling.

Blogger Alexander Lapshin has opened an account at the Armenian Artsakhbank to get the EUR 30,000 compensation from Azerbaijan, reports Public Radio of Armenia.

The European Court of Human Rights on Thursday ruled that Lapshin’s right to life had been violated during his detention in Baku and obliged Azerbaijan to pay 30,000 euros in compensation.

The case concerned an incident during the applicant’s imprisonment in Azerbaijan in 2017 for “having crossed the State border outside the checkpoints” during journeys to Nagorno-Karabakh, and the ensuing inquiry by the prosecutor’s office into the incident. The authorities asserted that the incident had been a suicide attempt, while the applicant alleged it had been attempted murder.

The applicant was resuscitated and hospitalized in an intensive-care unit. The following day the applicant was pardoned by the President of Azerbaijan and, upon his discharge from hospital three days later, was expelled to Israel.

The Court found that the inquiry into the prison incident had been ineffective and in breach of the respondent State’s procedural obligations under Article 2 of the Convention. It found that the respondent State had failed to satisfy the burden of proof resting on it to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation as regards the incident which had put the applicant’s life in danger. There had therefore been a violation of Article 2 under its substantive limb.

The Court held that Azerbaijan was to pay the applicant 30,000 euros (EUR) in respect of nonpecuniary damage.

- A WORD FROM OUR SPONSORS - spot_img

CATCH UP ON THE LATEST NEWS

Search other topics:

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, podcasts, and announcements.

Most Popular Articles